- Beranda
- Komunitas
- Trader Baru
- Hello everyone
Edit Komentar Anda
Hello everyone
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 07, 2019
44 postingan
Feb 21, 2019 at 13:02
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 07, 2019
44 postingan
AlHashim posted:togr posted:walpants posted:
hello and welcome, im new to, im doing a lot of reading on here, there is some very good advice on here.
I would not say you get proper education here on MFB
The forums are very good for tips and specific questions but there is better educational material in other places
of coarse, i am finding material from all over to add to my education.
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 13, 2019
10 postingan
Feb 24, 2019 at 07:24
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 13, 2019
10 postingan
have you tried babypips? they have a lot of great info for total beginner
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 02, 2017
46 postingan
Feb 24, 2019 at 13:19
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 02, 2017
46 postingan
After 4 years studying Forex I learned something called Positive Expectancy.
For example, in roulete game, your positive expectancy is:
Winning% - 1/38
Losing % - 37/38
Reward - 36
Loss - 1
Positive Expectancy = Winning% x Reward - Losing% x Loss
PE = 1/38 × 36 - 37/38 ×1
PE = 36/38 - 37/38
PE = -1/38 = - 2.63%
In short, no matter what you do, the house (Casino) has an edge. You only have luck to win the house...
But Casino has an insurance against lucky players: a max bet value.
But in Financial Markets, you need to do like Casino: a positive expectancy strategy with small bets in the long run.
Let's say your strategy has a winning ratio of 40%, a reward of 2, and you trade 20 positions a month, risking 0.5% per trade...
20 × 40% = 8 winning trades = 8 x 2 x 0.5% = 8% reward
20 x 60% = 12 losing trades = 12 x 1 x 0.5% = 6% loss
Monthly profit = 2%.
A 2% strategy means 27% a year... not bad, because 70% of retail traders fails! Why?
They don't have a strategy, they don't have money management. They only trust in luck.
If you want to win in market, you need:
1) a strategy where you know your risk (loss)
2) a strategy where you know your reward (profit)
3) a strategy where you know your winning ratio.
These 3 questions are not answered by 99% of Expert Advisors. Because Martingale/Grid/Averaging strategies (very common in these EAs) doesn't have a known risk. If a trade goes wrong, these EAs increase the risk in a new trade, to cover the previous loss and make some profit.
3 months of backtesting in a strategy that answer these 3 questions is enough. 1/3 months in foward test in a demo account is enough. Start small in real account, and be happy!
For example, in roulete game, your positive expectancy is:
Winning% - 1/38
Losing % - 37/38
Reward - 36
Loss - 1
Positive Expectancy = Winning% x Reward - Losing% x Loss
PE = 1/38 × 36 - 37/38 ×1
PE = 36/38 - 37/38
PE = -1/38 = - 2.63%
In short, no matter what you do, the house (Casino) has an edge. You only have luck to win the house...
But Casino has an insurance against lucky players: a max bet value.
But in Financial Markets, you need to do like Casino: a positive expectancy strategy with small bets in the long run.
Let's say your strategy has a winning ratio of 40%, a reward of 2, and you trade 20 positions a month, risking 0.5% per trade...
20 × 40% = 8 winning trades = 8 x 2 x 0.5% = 8% reward
20 x 60% = 12 losing trades = 12 x 1 x 0.5% = 6% loss
Monthly profit = 2%.
A 2% strategy means 27% a year... not bad, because 70% of retail traders fails! Why?
They don't have a strategy, they don't have money management. They only trust in luck.
If you want to win in market, you need:
1) a strategy where you know your risk (loss)
2) a strategy where you know your reward (profit)
3) a strategy where you know your winning ratio.
These 3 questions are not answered by 99% of Expert Advisors. Because Martingale/Grid/Averaging strategies (very common in these EAs) doesn't have a known risk. If a trade goes wrong, these EAs increase the risk in a new trade, to cover the previous loss and make some profit.
3 months of backtesting in a strategy that answer these 3 questions is enough. 1/3 months in foward test in a demo account is enough. Start small in real account, and be happy!
Trade safely... Remember, a high Drawdown means a high risk!
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 08, 2019
200 postingan
Feb 24, 2019 at 13:50
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 08, 2019
200 postingan
BipinBike posted:
have you tried babypips? they have a lot of great info for total beginner
I agree
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 25, 2019
10 postingan
Feb 25, 2019 at 13:49
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 25, 2019
10 postingan
Arcferreira posted:
After 4 years studying Forex I learned something called Positive Expectancy.
For example, in roulete game, your positive expectancy is:
Winning% - 1/38
Losing % - 37/38
Reward - 36
Loss - 1
Positive Expectancy = Winning% x Reward - Losing% x Loss
PE = 1/38 × 36 - 37/38 ×1
PE = 36/38 - 37/38
PE = -1/38 = - 2.63%
In short, no matter what you do, the house (Casino) has an edge. You only have luck to win the house...
But Casino has an insurance against lucky players: a max bet value.
But in Financial Markets, you need to do like Casino: a positive expectancy strategy with small bets in the long run.
Let's say your strategy has a winning ratio of 40%, a reward of 2, and you trade 20 positions a month, risking 0.5% per trade...
20 × 40% = 8 winning trades = 8 x 2 x 0.5% = 8% reward
20 x 60% = 12 losing trades = 12 x 1 x 0.5% = 6% loss
Monthly profit = 2%.
A 2% strategy means 27% a year... not bad, because 70% of retail traders fails! Why?
They don't have a strategy, they don't have money management. They only trust in luck.
If you want to win in market, you need:
1) a strategy where you know your risk (loss)
2) a strategy where you know your reward (profit)
3) a strategy where you know your winning ratio.
These 3 questions are not answered by 99% of Expert Advisors. Because Martingale/Grid/Averaging strategies (very common in these EAs) doesn't have a known risk. If a trade goes wrong, these EAs increase the risk in a new trade, to cover the previous loss and make some profit.
3 months of backtesting in a strategy that answer these 3 questions is enough. 1/3 months in foward test in a demo account is enough. Start small in real account, and be happy!
You make a very interesting point but the hard part for me has been finding a strategy that yields just 2%. Most strategy I try end up losing a lot not matter what I do
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 10, 2019
52 postingan
Mar 05, 2019 at 07:25
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 10, 2019
52 postingan
I agree, Babypips is really helpful!
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 11, 2019
27 postingan
Mar 10, 2019 at 06:47
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 11, 2019
27 postingan
hi and welcome! I have to say I love babypips, very good resource
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 07, 2019
44 postingan
Mar 12, 2019 at 09:30
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 07, 2019
44 postingan
babypips and youtube have some great stuff.
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 08, 2019
23 postingan
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 20, 2019
10 postingan
Mar 24, 2019 at 07:07
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 20, 2019
10 postingan
i agree with most here, babypips is the best place to learn
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 08, 2019
200 postingan
Mar 25, 2019 at 06:55
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 08, 2019
200 postingan
AharonGorion posted:Arcferreira posted:
After 4 years studying Forex I learned something called Positive Expectancy.
For example, in roulete game, your positive expectancy is:
Winning% - 1/38
Losing % - 37/38
Reward - 36
Loss - 1
Positive Expectancy = Winning% x Reward - Losing% x Loss
PE = 1/38 × 36 - 37/38 ×1
PE = 36/38 - 37/38
PE = -1/38 = - 2.63%
In short, no matter what you do, the house (Casino) has an edge. You only have luck to win the house...
But Casino has an insurance against lucky players: a max bet value.
But in Financial Markets, you need to do like Casino: a positive expectancy strategy with small bets in the long run.
Let's say your strategy has a winning ratio of 40%, a reward of 2, and you trade 20 positions a month, risking 0.5% per trade...
20 × 40% = 8 winning trades = 8 x 2 x 0.5% = 8% reward
20 x 60% = 12 losing trades = 12 x 1 x 0.5% = 6% loss
Monthly profit = 2%.
A 2% strategy means 27% a year... not bad, because 70% of retail traders fails! Why?
They don't have a strategy, they don't have money management. They only trust in luck.
If you want to win in market, you need:
1) a strategy where you know your risk (loss)
2) a strategy where you know your reward (profit)
3) a strategy where you know your winning ratio.
These 3 questions are not answered by 99% of Expert Advisors. Because Martingale/Grid/Averaging strategies (very common in these EAs) doesn't have a known risk. If a trade goes wrong, these EAs increase the risk in a new trade, to cover the previous loss and make some profit.
3 months of backtesting in a strategy that answer these 3 questions is enough. 1/3 months in foward test in a demo account is enough. Start small in real account, and be happy!
You make a very interesting point but the hard part for me has been finding a strategy that yields just 2%. Most strategy I try end up losing a lot not matter what I do
Doesn't have to be 2%. You can set yourself free with 0.5% edge or even lower
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Jul 12, 2018
23 postingan
Apr 01, 2019 at 08:15
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Jul 12, 2018
23 postingan
Mikelsius posted:
I have been training for some time and now I am in the test phase in demo accounts :)
I'm from Barcelona, regards!
Hi! And how is your trading going now? I'm sure you have found yourself a profitable strategy?
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 22, 2011
4573 postingan
Apr 01, 2019 at 10:29
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 22, 2011
4573 postingan
Treeny posted:AharonGorion posted:Arcferreira posted:
After 4 years studying Forex I learned something called Positive Expectancy.
For example, in roulete game, your positive expectancy is:
Winning% - 1/38
Losing % - 37/38
Reward - 36
Loss - 1
Positive Expectancy = Winning% x Reward - Losing% x Loss
PE = 1/38 × 36 - 37/38 ×1
PE = 36/38 - 37/38
PE = -1/38 = - 2.63%
In short, no matter what you do, the house (Casino) has an edge. You only have luck to win the house...
But Casino has an insurance against lucky players: a max bet value.
But in Financial Markets, you need to do like Casino: a positive expectancy strategy with small bets in the long run.
Let's say your strategy has a winning ratio of 40%, a reward of 2, and you trade 20 positions a month, risking 0.5% per trade...
20 × 40% = 8 winning trades = 8 x 2 x 0.5% = 8% reward
20 x 60% = 12 losing trades = 12 x 1 x 0.5% = 6% loss
Monthly profit = 2%.
A 2% strategy means 27% a year... not bad, because 70% of retail traders fails! Why?
They don't have a strategy, they don't have money management. They only trust in luck.
If you want to win in market, you need:
1) a strategy where you know your risk (loss)
2) a strategy where you know your reward (profit)
3) a strategy where you know your winning ratio.
These 3 questions are not answered by 99% of Expert Advisors. Because Martingale/Grid/Averaging strategies (very common in these EAs) doesn't have a known risk. If a trade goes wrong, these EAs increase the risk in a new trade, to cover the previous loss and make some profit.
3 months of backtesting in a strategy that answer these 3 questions is enough. 1/3 months in foward test in a demo account is enough. Start small in real account, and be happy!
You make a very interesting point but the hard part for me has been finding a strategy that yields just 2%. Most strategy I try end up losing a lot not matter what I do
Doesn't have to be 2%. You can set yourself free with 0.5% edge or even lower
It is nice to calculate expectancy when you know you have 8 winning trades and 12 losing trades.
But you never know how many trades will be winning and how many loosing.
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Oct 31, 2018
10 postingan
Apr 01, 2019 at 12:41
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Oct 31, 2018
10 postingan
Treeny posted:AharonGorion posted:Arcferreira posted:
After 4 years studying Forex I learned something called Positive Expectancy.
For example, in roulete game, your positive expectancy is:
Winning% - 1/38
Losing % - 37/38
Reward - 36
Loss - 1
Positive Expectancy = Winning% x Reward - Losing% x Loss
PE = 1/38 × 36 - 37/38 ×1
PE = 36/38 - 37/38
PE = -1/38 = - 2.63%
In short, no matter what you do, the house (Casino) has an edge. You only have luck to win the house...
But Casino has an insurance against lucky players: a max bet value.
But in Financial Markets, you need to do like Casino: a positive expectancy strategy with small bets in the long run.
Let's say your strategy has a winning ratio of 40%, a reward of 2, and you trade 20 positions a month, risking 0.5% per trade...
20 × 40% = 8 winning trades = 8 x 2 x 0.5% = 8% reward
20 x 60% = 12 losing trades = 12 x 1 x 0.5% = 6% loss
Monthly profit = 2%.
A 2% strategy means 27% a year... not bad, because 70% of retail traders fails! Why?
They don't have a strategy, they don't have money management. They only trust in luck.
If you want to win in market, you need:
1) a strategy where you know your risk (loss)
2) a strategy where you know your reward (profit)
3) a strategy where you know your winning ratio.
These 3 questions are not answered by 99% of Expert Advisors. Because Martingale/Grid/Averaging strategies (very common in these EAs) doesn't have a known risk. If a trade goes wrong, these EAs increase the risk in a new trade, to cover the previous loss and make some profit.
3 months of backtesting in a strategy that answer these 3 questions is enough. 1/3 months in foward test in a demo account is enough. Start small in real account, and be happy!
You make a very interesting point but the hard part for me has been finding a strategy that yields just 2%. Most strategy I try end up losing a lot not matter what I do
Doesn't have to be 2%. You can set yourself free with 0.5% edge or even lower
I find getting an edge the difficult bit. I have trade the standard strategies but none of them give me the "edge" that means I can beat the market and get some profit. 0.5% would be a vast improvement on the 20% loss that I am currently in
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 03, 2019
57 postingan
Nov 05, 2019 at 11:31
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 03, 2019
57 postingan
Atchris posted:yes i started off using Babypips and found it helped a lot.
i agree with most here, babypips is the best place to learn
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Nov 03, 2020
63 postingan
Jul 06, 2021 at 04:27
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Nov 03, 2020
63 postingan
I think it's right to learn as much as possible about how the market works and how you can improve your trading system
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 18, 2021
10 postingan
Jul 22, 2021 at 07:24
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Feb 18, 2021
10 postingan
Just like many others said, babypips is a good place to learn forex trading. For more sources of forex learning, certain youtube lectures are also worth watching.
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Jul 23, 2020
696 postingan
Sep 05, 2021 at 13:47
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Jul 23, 2020
696 postingan
Hello in the forum. It is one of the best communities for traders.
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Apr 16, 2017
37 postingan
Sep 05, 2021 at 15:21
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Apr 16, 2017
37 postingan
Mikelsius posted:
I have been training for some time and now I am in the test phase in demo accounts :)
I'm from Barcelona, regards!
Hello mate I wish you all the best
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 28, 2021
586 postingan
Sep 06, 2021 at 05:40
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Mar 28, 2021
586 postingan
Hello and welcome to the community. Keep learning and practicing. You will get to know what more you need to do. Best of luck.
*Penggunaan komersial dan spam tidak akan ditoleransi dan dapat mengakibatkan penutupan akun.
Tips: Memposting URL gambar/YouTube akan otomatis menyematkannya di postingan Anda!
Tips: Ketik tanda @ untuk melengkapi nama pengguna secara otomatis yang berpartisipasi dalam diskusi ini.