- Beranda
- Komunitas
- Kotak Saran
- Strategy Section Sanity Please
Strategy Section Sanity Please hasil suara
Edit Komentar Anda
Diskusi Strategy Section Sanity Please
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Oct 28, 2009
1414 postingan
Jun 26, 2010 at 09:54
(diedit Jun 26, 2010 at 09:54 yang lalu)
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Oct 28, 2009
1414 postingan
It appears that a strategy tester arms race has commenced in the strategy section and I realise I am one of the superpowers involved! So my apologies for that.
I think it would be good to set some rules for strategy tests to make the top ten, else they don't get in there.
Such as:
Backtests must start on the first day of MT4 data.
Backtests must start with $10,000 capital
Backtests must use a fixed lot size of 1 standard lot.
I realise that this will make Martingale strategies ineligible but as most of them blow up on a ten year backtest this shouldn't be an issue.
Be good to hear other people's thoughts on this.
I think it would be good to set some rules for strategy tests to make the top ten, else they don't get in there.
Such as:
Backtests must start on the first day of MT4 data.
Backtests must start with $10,000 capital
Backtests must use a fixed lot size of 1 standard lot.
I realise that this will make Martingale strategies ineligible but as most of them blow up on a ten year backtest this shouldn't be an issue.
Be good to hear other people's thoughts on this.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Aug 20, 2009
256 postingan
Jun 26, 2010 at 11:01
Menjadi Anggota Sejak Aug 20, 2009
256 postingan
Hi Steve,
I agree with your sentiment, although I think a simpler way would be to provide a backtest with a drawdown of less than 10%. Some back tests are just running up huge numbers, but if the max drawdown is limited, then the risk levels will have to be adjusted downwards to more realistic levels by most participants.
I agree with your sentiment, although I think a simpler way would be to provide a backtest with a drawdown of less than 10%. Some back tests are just running up huge numbers, but if the max drawdown is limited, then the risk levels will have to be adjusted downwards to more realistic levels by most participants.
Wealth Creation Through Technology
*Penggunaan komersial dan spam tidak akan ditoleransi dan dapat mengakibatkan penutupan akun.
Tips: Memposting URL gambar/YouTube akan otomatis menyematkannya di postingan Anda!
Tips: Ketik tanda @ untuk melengkapi nama pengguna secara otomatis yang berpartisipasi dalam diskusi ini.