Fewpips logo

Fewpips

Diklaim
47 ulasan
Diklaim
47 ulasan
Fewpips is a proprietary trading firm that offers evaluation programs where traders can demonstrate their trading skills and gain access to funded trading accounts with simulated capital. The firm provides challenges with defined risk rules, profit targets, and account sizes up to several hundred thousand dollars. Successful traders can receive payouts based on performance, with profit splits reaching up to 90%, depending on the program.

Alternatif dengan Peringkat Tertinggi

Lihat semua alternatif
Skor Ulasan
Platform
Harga
Layanan pelanggan
Fitur
Fewpips
Tahun Didirikan
2026
Mata Uang Akun
USD
Biaya Pengembalian
Copy Trading
Scaling
EA diizinkan
Broker
-
Jam Dukungan
24/5
Metode pembayaran
Crypto
Metode pembayaran
Crypto, Credit/Debit Card
Platform Trading
-
Jenis Drawdown Harian
Trailing Highest Balance/Equity
Jenis Kerugian Maksimum
Trailing Equity
Jenis Aset
Crypto, Indices, Commodities, Forex, Metal
Negara Didirikan
Saint Lucia
Frekuensi Payout
Payout Frequency: Traders can request payouts approximately every 14 days, depending on the account type and program rules.
Situs Web
Fewpips Ulasan Pengguna
Fewpips Ulasan Pengguna
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Oct 22 at 18:45
Belum Terverifikasi
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Oct 19 at 16:20
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Oct 20 at 16:37
Thank you for this, Eddie, the observation about the evaluation itself starting to affect your trading is something more traders should hear.

When a countdown starts influencing which setups you take, the evaluation is no longer testing your trading, it's testing how well you perform under deadline pressure. Those are very different things, and the results rarely reflect how you'd actually trade a funded account. Removing that variable was a deliberate decision on our part for exactly this reason.

Your point about adjusting position sizing to survive a normal losing streak is solid practical advice. The rules won't protect an account from oversized positions, and traders who work that out before they start will always find the challenge more manageable.

Thank you for the 5/5 ratings across the board and for a review that cuts straight to what actually matters.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Oct 07 at 18:21
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Oct 12 at 23:22
Thank you for this, Carl, that shift from 'how quickly can I hit the target' to thinking in daily and weekly risk is exactly the kind of development we hope the evaluation produces.

Cutting out trades that shouldn't have been taken anyway is a real and underrated benefit of a structured environment. When there's no clock forcing your hand, the marginal setups the ones you'd take just to feel like you're doing something stop looking attractive. That's a genuine improvement in trading behaviour, not just challenge performance.

Your caveat is fair and well put. Removing the deadline removes a source of pressure, but it doesn't remove the need for discipline. The risk framework is still there and it still needs to be respected.

Thank you for a review that gets to what the evaluation actually does for a trader's process.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
4/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
4/5
Fitur
4/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Oct 05 at 15:34
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Oct 12 at 23:21
Thank you for this, Christina, 'staying within the rules long enough for your edge to play out' is one of the clearest descriptions of what a good evaluation mindset looks like.

The shift from chasing a target to simply trading well and letting the numbers follow is something a lot of traders talk about but struggle to actually do in practice. The no-deadline structure is designed to make that easier and it sounds like it clicked for you in exactly the right way.

Your honesty about the slower periods is worth saying too. Progress that feels slow but stays within the rules is always better than progress that feels fast but blows up the account. We'd rather fund the former every time.

Thank you for the 5/5 on customer service and the thoughtful review.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
4/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
4/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Sep 28 at 15:23
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Sep 28 at 19:03
Thank you for this, Jared — the insight about how you behave during a losing streak being more important than finding winning trades is something a lot of traders learn the hard way.

The ability to step back, reduce size and wait rather than immediately trying to recover is exactly the kind of response the unlimited evaluation period is designed to allow. Forcing a trader to claw back losses against a ticking clock almost always makes things worse removing that pressure changes the decision entirely.

Your advice about deciding maximum risk per trade before entering a position is one of the most practical things a trader could read before starting a challenge. Reverse-engineering position size from a profit target is a pattern that catches a lot of people out, and saying it plainly like that will genuinely help others avoid it.

Thank you for a review that goes beyond the platform and into the actual trading psychology. That kind of honesty is rare and we appreciate it.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
4/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Sep 24 at 15:51
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Sep 28 at 19:02
Thank you for this 'a risk-management exercise rather than a race to hit the target' is exactly the mindset shift we hope traders make.

The point about looking at the drawdown first rather than the profit target is genuinely valuable advice and something we'd echo to any trader considering an evaluation. An attractive target means nothing if your normal risk per trade isn't compatible with the loss limits and traders who work that out before they start will always have a smoother experience than those who discover it mid-challenge.

The ability to go several days without a trade and not feel penalised for it is precisely why the unlimited evaluation period matters. For traders who rely on patience and setup quality over volume, that freedom is worth more than almost any other feature.

We appreciate the balanced and considered review. Thank you for sharing an approach that will help other traders think more clearly about what to look for.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
3/5
Layanan pelanggan
4/5
Fitur
4/5
1-3 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Sep 21 at 16:04
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Sep 28 at 19:00
Thank you for this and honestly, this is one of the most practical pieces of advice we've seen in a review.

Mapping your own average stop loss, risk per trade, weekly trade frequency and typical holding periods against a firm's conditions before buying is exactly the kind of due diligence that separates traders who thrive in an evaluation from those who struggle. The question isn't whether Fewpips is good in general — it's whether it fits how you specifically trade.

We're glad the no time limit, weekend holding and multiple challenge options ticked the right boxes when you ran that comparison. That's a much more meaningful endorsement than a price-based decision.

Thank you for the thoughtful review and for sharing an approach that will genuinely help other traders make a better choice.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
4/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
4/5
Fitur
3/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Sep 03 at 16:15
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Sep 08 at 12:03
Thank you for this, Hamleton 'pleasantly surprised' from someone who doesn't expect much from prop firm support is genuinely one of the better compliments we could receive.

Getting clarification on rules and account conditions before placing trades is exactly the right approach, and we're glad the support channels made that easy to do quickly. Confidence going into a trade matters, and not having to wait days for a simple answer is the least we can offer.

Your point about not substituting a support conversation for reading the actual terms is well worth saying publicly. Our team can explain and clarify, but the responsibility for knowing the rules before trading still sits with the trader and traders who treat it that way will always have a smoother experience.

We'll take the platform and pricing ratings on board. Thank you for the honest and balanced write-up.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
3/5
Harga
3/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Sep 01 at 14:40
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Sep 02 at 09:05
Thank you, Nyle! This is a thoughtful write-up and we appreciate the time you took on it.

You've described exactly what the 1-Step was built for. Removing the time limit was a deliberate decision: a countdown doesn't measure skill, it measures how well someone tolerates pressure we invented. Traders who wait for their setups shouldn't be penalised for being patient, and it sounds like that's how you're using it.

Your point on the 40% consistency rule is one we wish more people made. It isn't there to make passing harder, it's there so that a funded account reflects a repeatable process rather than one oversized trade that happened to land. Traders who pass with balanced daily results are the ones who tend to hold their accounts afterwards.

And your advice is the right advice: read the full ruleset before you start, not after. The daily loss limit, maximum drawdown and consistency requirement matter more than the profit target, and we'd rather a trader knows that on day one than discovers it at payout. Everything is published for that reason.

Good luck with the rest of your journey. We're glad the structure fits how you trade.

- The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
2/5
Fitur
3/5
1-3 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 24 at 14:51
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 26 at 13:48
Thank you for such a practical and balanced breakdown.

You've framed the crypto payout option exactly as it should be understood a convenience feature for traders who already operate in that space, not a blanket upgrade over traditional methods. The 24-hour processing window and $50 minimum are there to make withdrawals as frictionless as possible for those it suits.

Your note on network selection, wallet details, and transaction fees is genuinely useful for anyone reading this who is new to crypto withdrawals. Those are real considerations and worth thinking through before submitting a request.

We appreciate the honest, methodical review and will take the customer service rating on board. Thank you for taking the time.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
3/5
Fitur
4/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 19 at 16:45
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 24 at 14:24
Thank you for articulating this so well, Ricky — it's a distinction that doesn't get talked about enough.

The psychological shift from 'pass the challenge' to 'trade consistently' is exactly the transition we want funded traders to make. Chasing a percentage on a funded account would just recreate the same pressure that causes poor decisions during the evaluation — so we deliberately don't ask for it.

You're right that removing the target doesn't remove the risk framework. The drawdown restrictions, per-trade rules, and payout conditions still apply, and that's intentional too. The account still needs to be managed professionally — there's just no arbitrary number pushing traders toward unnecessary aggression.

We appreciate the balanced and thoughtful review. Thank you for taking the time to share it.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
3/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
4/5
Fitur
4/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 18 at 17:57
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 24 at 14:24
Thank you for this and for making the distinction between having the option and always using it.

That's exactly the right way to think about it. Weekend holding isn't a reason to keep every position open regardless of conditions — it's about having the choice to make that call yourself rather than having it made for you by an arbitrary Friday cutoff. For swing and position traders, that autonomy genuinely changes how you can structure a trade.

Your point about gap risk is worth saying publicly too. Markets can behave very differently on Monday, and traders who hold through weekends should be factoring that into their risk assessment on every position. The permission is there the judgement still has to be yours.

Thank you for the 5/5 ratings and for such a considered write-up.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 17 at 16:29
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 24 at 14:25
Thank you for this thoughtful perspective.

The point about personal accounts and emotional risk adjustments is one that resonates with a lot of traders. Having predefined limits removes the temptation to move the goalposts when a trade isn't going your way and for traders who already operate with discipline, those limits rarely feel like a constraint because they're not pushing against them anyway.

Your caveat is fair too. Traders who want complete freedom over leverage and position sizing will find the structure here more rigid than they'd prefer, and it's worth knowing that going in.

Thank you for the balanced take and the 5/5 ratings. We appreciate it.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 12 at 16:57
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:42
Thank you for the thoughtful review, Joshua.

You've framed it well — a defined framework isn't a limitation for disciplined traders, it's actually an advantage. Knowing exactly where the boundaries are allows you to build a strategy around them with confidence.

Your point about understanding prohibited practices before opening positions is important and worth echoing publicly. The rules exist to protect the integrity of the program, and traders who take time to read them thoroughly will always be better positioned.

We appreciate the balanced feedback and look forward to supporting your journey with Fewpips.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
4/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
4/5
Fitur
4/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 11 at 17:12
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:42
Thank you for this, and for the 5/5 ratings across the board!

Clarity around profit targets, drawdown limits, and trading rules isn't something every prop firm prioritises — but we think it should be. When traders can see exactly what's expected from the start, they can build a plan around the challenge rather than figuring it out as they go.

Your note about reading the complete conditions is well made. The headline rules give a good overview, but the full picture matters and traders who dig into the details will always be better prepared.

We look forward to seeing you succeed with Fewpips.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
1-3 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 06 at 18:20
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:42
Thank you for such a detailed and generous review!

The word 'comfortable' really stands out to us — that's not something you hear often about prop firm evaluations, and it's exactly the experience we've worked to create. Trading without a deadline looming changes everything about how you approach each session, and it sounds like that came through clearly for you.

We're also glad the multiple evaluation options, EA support, weekend holding, and coaching all added up to something that felt genuinely suited to how you trade rather than forcing you to adapt to us. That's the intention behind every one of those features.

Thank you for the 5/5 ratings and for the thoughtful write-up. Wishing you every success with your funded account!

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
1-3 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 05 at 16:18
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:43
Thank you for this, Mike — 'encourages better trading habits' is one of the best descriptions of what we're trying to do.

The principles you mention — patience, flexibility to choose your own evaluation model, tools that support how you already trade — are all deliberate. We'd rather build an environment that helps traders reinforce good habits than one that tests how well they perform under artificial pressure.

Your observation about the evaluation requiring careful planning and disciplined execution is fair and worth saying out loud. Traders who approach it professionally will get the most out of it.

Thank you for the honest, balanced review. We're glad the overall experience was positive and look forward to supporting your long-term trading career.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
3/5
Harga
4/5
Layanan pelanggan
4/5
Fitur
4/5
1-3 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Aug 03 at 14:49
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:43
Thank you — and that title says it better than we ever could!

The belief that successful trading is built over hundreds of disciplined trades rather than a handful of lucky ones is exactly the philosophy our evaluation is designed around. One outsized winning day shouldn't carry an entire challenge, and our consistency rule exists precisely to reflect that.

We're also glad the coaching element gave you added confidence before signing up. The fact that we invest in that is a signal of where our priorities lie — we want traders to improve, not just to pay for attempts.

Thank you for the 5/5 ratings and for articulating our values so clearly. It's a pleasure having traders like you in the Fewpips community.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Jul 28 at 14:51
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:43
Thank you for sharing such an honest comparison with your previous prop firm experiences!

The fact that the 2-Step evaluation felt like a logical progression rather than an overwhelming hurdle is really encouraging to hear. Different traders have different styles, risk tolerances, and confidence levels — which is exactly why we offer multiple evaluation paths rather than a one-size-fits-all model.

Your point about the minimum trading day requirement is a fair one to highlight publicly. It's there to ensure consistency is demonstrated over time, not achieved in a single session — and traders who understand that going in will find it much easier to plan around.

We're delighted the experience has been extremely positive so far. Looking forward to seeing you thrive with your funded account!

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
<1 tahun pengalaman dengan Fewpips
Jul 27 at 14:20
Belum Terverifikasi
Balasan dari Fewpips
Aug 16 at 22:43
Thank you for this — 'taking fewer trades improved my results' is something a lot of traders need to hear.

It's a counterintuitive outcome but not a surprising one. When you remove the urgency of a ticking clock, the instinct to force trades goes with it. Some weeks the market simply doesn't offer what your plan requires, and being able to sit those weeks out without penalty is a genuine edge.

Your honest note about the freedom working against you if you lack self-discipline is well worth saying publicly too. Without a deadline, the responsibility for momentum sits entirely with the trader — and that suits some personalities far better than others.

We're glad Fewpips turned out to be the right fit for yours.

— The Fewpips Team
Platform
5/5
Harga
5/5
Layanan pelanggan
5/5
Fitur
5/5
Fewpips Ulasan Pengguna